[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] The duke of Surrie stood vp also against the lord Fitzwater, auouching that where he had said that the appellants were causers of the duke of Glocesters death, it was false, for they were constrained to sue the same appeale, in like manner as the said lord Fitzwater was compelled to giue iudgement a|gainst the duke of Glocester, and the earle of Arun|dell; so that the suing of the appeale was doone by constraint, and if he said contrarie he lied: and there|with he threw downe his hood. The lord Fitzwater answered herevnto, that he was not present in the parlement house, when iudgement was giuen a|gainst them, and all the lords bare witnesse thereof. Moreouer, where it was alledged that the duke of Aumarle should send two of his seruants to Calis, to murther the duke of Glocester, the said duke of Aumarle said, that if the duke of Norfolke affirme it, he lied falselie, and that he would proue with his bo|die, throwing downe an other hood which he had bo|rowed. The same was likewise deliuered to the con|stable and marshall of England, and the king licen|ced the duke of Norfolke to returne, that he might arraigne his appeale. After this was Iohn Hall con|demned of treason by authoritie of the parlement, Fabian. for that he had confessed himselfe to be one of them that put the duke of Glocester to death at Calis, and so on the mondaie following,Iohn Hall ex|ecuted. he was drawne from the Tower to Tiburne, and there hanged, bowelled, headed, and quartered: his head being sent to Calis there to be set vp, where the duke was murthered.