Compare 1577 edition: 1 2 ¶ There were reasons alledged why the king of England séemed to do wrong in challenging as then the kingdome of Scotland: and amongst other, N. Triuet. one was, that such homage as had beene doone of ancient time to the kings of England, by the kings of the Scots, was onelie meant for Tindale, Penreth, and such other lands as the Scotish kings held within England, and not for the realme of Scotland. And whereas the kings of Scotland had aided the kings of England in their warres against the rebels of the realme of England, and beene present at their co|ronation, the same was doone of speciall fauour, and not of dutie. K. Edward hauing receiued the popes prescript, and well considered the whole contents ther|of, sent in writing his answer at large, proouing by euident reasons that the right of proprietie in the kingdome of Scotland, did most iustlie apperteine vnto him, and that the allegations were not true, but forged, which had béene by surmised information presented against him.
Compare 1577 edition: 1 Beside the kings letters, which he wrote in his owne behalfe, there was an other letter deuised and written by all the lords temporall of the land, assem|bled in parlement at Lincolne, in which letter they answered in name of all the estates there gathered, vnto that point wherein the pope pretended a right to be iudge for the title of the realme of Scotland, pro|testing flatlie, that they would not consent that their king should doo any thing that might tend to the dis|heriting of the right of the crowne of England, and plaine ouerthrow of the state of the same realme, and EEBO page image 310 also hurt of the liberties, customs, and lawes of their fathers, sith it was neuer knowne, that the kings of this land had answered or ought to answer for their rights in the same realme, afore any iudge ecclesia|sticall or secular.
9.1. The tenour of the foresaid letter indited and directed to pope Boniface.
The tenour of the foresaid letter indited and directed to pope Boniface.
Compare 1577 edition: 1 _TO our most holie father in Christ, Boniface by Gods prouidence high bishop of the holie Romane and vniuersall church, his deuout sonnes Iohn earle Warren, Thomas erle of Lancaster, Rafe de Monthermer earle of Glocester and Hereford, Humfrey de Bo|hun earle of Hertford and Essex and con|stable of England, Roger Bigod earle of Norfolke, and mareschall of England, Guie earle of Warwike, Richard earle of Arundell, Adomare de Ualence lord of Monterney, Henrie de Lancaster lord of Monmouth; Iohn de Hastings lord of Bergeuennie, Henrie de Perrie lord of Topclife, Edmund de Mortimer lord of Wigmor, Robert Fitz Walter lord of Wodham, Iohn de S. Iohn lord of Han|nake, Hugh de Ueer lord of Swanestampe, William de Breuse lord of Gower, Robert de Monthault lord of Hawarden, Robert de Tateshall lord of Wokeham, Reignold de Grey lord of Ruthin, Henrie de Grey lord of Coduore, Hugh Bardolfe lord of Wormegaie, Robert de Clifford chatel|laine of Appelbie, Peter de Malowe lord of Mulgreene, Philip lord of Kime, Robert Fitz Roger lord of Clauerings, Iohn de Mohun lord of Dunester, Almerike de S. Amound lord of Widehaie, William de Ferrers lord of Grobie, Alane de Zouche lord of Ashbie, Theobald de Uerdon lord of Webbeley, Thomas de Furniuall lord of Schefield, Thomas de Multon lord of Egremont, William Latimer lord of Tor|bie, Thomas lord Berkley, Foulke Fitz Warren lord of Mitingham, Iohn lord Segraue, Edmund de Eincourt lord of Thurgerton, Peter Corbet lord of Caus, William de Cantelowe lord of Rauens|thorpe, Iohn de Beauchampe lord of Hac|che, Roger de Mortimer lord of Penketh|lin, Iohn Fitz Reignold lord of Blenleueny Rafe de Neuill lord of Rabie, Brian Fitz Alane lord of Bedale, William Marshall lord of Hengham, Walter lord Hunter|combe, William Martin lord of Cameis, Henrie de Thies lord of Chilton, Roger le Ware lord of Isefield, Iohn de Riuers lord of Augre. Iohn de Lancaster lord of Grise|dale, Robert Fitz Paine lord of Lainnier, Henrie Tregoz lord of Garinges, Robert Hipard lord of Lomford, Walter lord Fan|comberge, Roger le Strange lord of Elles|mer, Iohn le Strange lord of Cnokin, Thomas de Chances lord of Norton, Walter de Beauchampe lord of Alecester, Richard Talbot lord of Eccleswell, Iohn Butetourt lord of Mendesham, Iohn En|gain lord of Colum, Hugh de Poinz lord of Corneualet, Adam L. of Wels, Simon L. Montacute, Iohn L. Sulle, Iohn de Mel|les or Moelles L. of Candeburie, Edmund baron Stafford,Hastings I take it. Iohn Louell lord of Hack|ings, Edmund de N. lord of Elchimhono|kes, Rafe Fitz William L. of Grimthorpe, Robert de Scales lord of Neusels, Willi|am Tuchet lord of Lewenhales, Iohn A|badan lord of Deuerston, Iohn de Haue|rings lord of Grafton, Robert la Ward lord of Whitehall, Nicholas de Segraue lord of Stow, Walter de Tey L. of Ston|graue, Iohn de Lisle lord of Wodton, Eu|stace lord Hacche, Gilbert Peche L. of Cor|bie, William Painell lord Trachington, Rog. de Albo monasterio,Whitemins [...] I thinke. Foulke le Strange lord of Corsham, Henrie de Pinkenie lord of Wedon, Iohn de Hodeleston lord of A|neis, Iohn de Huntingfield lord of Bra|denham, Hugh Fitz Henrie lord of Raue|neswath, Iohn Daleton lord of Sporle, Nicholas de Carrie lord of Mulesford,Thus far [...] of M Par|kins of the in|ner temple. Thomas lord de la Roche, Wal. de Mun|cie lord of Thornton, Iohn Fitz Marma|duke lord of Horden, Iohn lord of Kingston, Robert Hastings the father lord of Che|bessey, Rafe lord Grendon, William lord of Leiborne, Iohn de Greistocke lord of Morpath, Matthew Fitz Iohn lord of Stokenham, Nicholas de Neuell lord of Wherlton, and Iohn Painell lord of Ateli, with all humble submission.
Compare 1577 edition: 1 2 The holie mother church,Out of mai|ster Fox. pag. 427. by whose mi|nisterie the catholike see is gouerned, in hir deeds (as we throughlie beleeue and hold) proceedeth with that ripenesse in iudge|ment, that she will be hurtfull to none, but like a mother would euerie mans right be kept vnbroken, aswell in another, as in hir selfe. Whereas therfore in a generall par|lement called at Lincolne of late, by our most dread lord Edward by the grace of God the noble king of England; the same our lord caused certeine letters receiued from you to be read openlie, and to be decla|red seriousl [...]e afore vs, about certeine busi|nesse touching the condition and state of the realme of Scotland: we did not a lit|tle muse and maruell with our selues, hea|ring the meanings concerning the same, so wondrous and strange as the like we haue not heard at any time before. For we know most holie father, and it is well knowne as|well within this realme of England (as al|so not vnknowne to other persons besides) that from the first beginning of the realme of England, the certeine and direct gouern|ment of the realme of Scotland in all tem|porall causes from time to time belonged to the kings of the same relme of England and relme of Scotland, aswell in the times both of the Britains as also Englishmen, yea rather the same realme of Scotland of old time was in fee to the ancestours of our foresaid lords kings of England, yea and to himselfe.
Compare 1577 edition: 1 2 Furthermore, the kings of Scots and the realme haue not beene vnder any other EEBO page image 311 than the kings of England, and the kings of England haue answered or ought to an|swer for their rights in the foresaid relme, or for anie his temporalities before anie iudge ecclesiasticall or secular, by reason of free preheminence of the state of his roiall dignitie and custome kept without breach at all times. Wherefore, after treatie had, and diligent deliberation of the contents in your foresaid letters, this was the com|mon agreement & consent with one mind, and shall be without faile in time to come by Gods grace, that our foresaid lord the king ought by no meanes to answer in iudgement in any case, or should bring his foresaid rights into doubt, nor ought not to send any proctors or messengers to your presence, speciallie seeing that the premis|ses tend manifestlie to the disheriting of the right of the crowne of England, and the plaine ouerthrowe of the state of the said realme, and also hurt of the liberties, customes and lawes of our fathers, for the keeping & defense of which we are bound by the duetie of the oth made, and we will mainteine them with all power, and will defend them (by Gods helpe) with all strength; and furthermore, will not suffer our foresaid lord the king to doo or by anie means attempt the premisses being so vn|accustomed, vnwont, and not hard of afore. Wherefore we reuerentlie and humblie beseech your holinesse, that yee would suffer the same our lord king of England (who a|mong other princes of the world sheweth himselfe catholike and deuout to the Ro|mish church) quietlie to inioy his rights, liberties, customes, and lawes aforesaid: without all impairing and trouble, and let them continue vntouched. In witnesse whereof, we haue set our seales to these presents, as well for vs, as for the whole communaltie of the foresaid relme of Eng|land. Dated at Lincolne the twelfth of Fe|bruarie, in the yeare of our Lord 1301, Et anno Edwardi primi 29.